Illinois Leasing Agent Practice Exam

A visually impaired man inquires about renting an apartment and uses an assistant animal. What might he be responsible for regarding the property?

1. Repairs to the unit if the assistance animal or owner damage the property

2. Paying a pet deposit as required by the landlord

3. Providing extensive vet records for the assistant animal

4. Finding alternative accommodation without an assistant animal

The correct answer is: Repairs to the unit if the assistance animal or owner damage the property

In the scenario presented, the visually impaired man utilizing an assistant animal is indeed likely to be responsible for any repairs to the unit that result from damage caused by either the animal or himself. This principle aligns with the general lease agreements that stipulate tenants must maintain the premises and are responsible for any damages they cause. While service animals are not considered pets under the law, tenants with assistant animals still hold accountability for their actions and the condition of the property. Typically, landlords are required to make reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities, such as allowing assistant animals. However, this does not absolve the tenant from the responsibility for damage that might occur in the unit. Therefore, if the assistance animal were to cause damage, the tenant would be on the hook for repairs just as they would be for any other type of damage that is a result of their own actions or those of individuals within their control. On the other hand, pet deposits are not applicable in this scenario since assistant animals are not classified as pets and therefore do not usually require such fees. Providing extensive veterinary records is unnecessary in this context as assistant animals are not subjected to the same requirements as conventional pets. Lastly, finding alternative accommodation without an assistant animal would fundamentally contradict the rights afforded to individuals with